Business Leadership :: essays research papers

Parallel to the growing that has occured in the business world in decades past, is the evolution of views on participative lead among managers. Participative leadership refers to the manner in which employers take away come to treat their employees. This handling has evolved from days of traditional, autocratic relationships in which employees were told exactly what tasks to do, without regard to their feelings or what knowing input could be made to todays spectrum of treatment delineate by two terms, valet relations and gay resources. Managers approaches today, now consider, non only the employees feelings, simply the potential added benefits they might be adequate to realize to the firm. The difference between human relations and human resources lies in the goals and expectations of the manager. With human relations, the managers primary concern is reducing employee resistance to assurance with the satisfaction of the employees basic needs to feel accomplishment and be long in the company secondary is the performance and added benefits the employee may be able to contribute once morale is increased. On the other hand, managers who practices human resources grammatical construction to empower their employees by encouraging them to take initiative and reach goals by their own capabilities and resources. With the sense of self-accomplishment gained by doing this, it is then that employee morale will be raised. Not only will the employees presence truly matter, but the companys productivity and success will also be greater. Managers stances today argon headed in the direction of the human resources model, a dear move for the welfare of company relations and success, but there are those who still practice human relations. Many companies demonstrate both models, proving employer/employee relationships in todays companies continue to range the spectrum. Two guiding companies of the human resource model are Lucent Technologies and Miller Brewing Compan y. The employees of these firms have been empowered with the ability to work in teams and achieve goals on their own. This flexibleness has resulted in creativity and productivity unseen before. The effect greater employee morale, respect, and general company success. With the human relations model, such success is uncomparable. Understandably, there are those who still advocate it though. Those people might look at such successful companies as bloody shame Kay Cosmetics. The consultants of this firm enjoy the encouragement and widespread support, making job loyalty and morale very high. However, in reality, employees of Mary Kay dont have the opportunity or flexibility to explore their ideas in terms of corporate and influential decisions.