PHILOSOPHY CLASS-LONG PAPER Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

PHILOSOPHY CLASS-LONG PAPER - Essay ExampleThe dead can bear no responsibility for their symboliseions. At best, smith is a zombie, under the control of the scientist. An animated corpse is simply an means being used to fulfill the will of the master. Within this system, the scientist is fully alive. He feels pleasure by overcoming displeasures, which in this case would be technical difficulties with his zombie and his chip that prevent Smith from use uping out his masters will. With every victory over Smith, the master (the scientist) stimulates his will to power and therefore is fully alive. The scientist follows all the rules of pilot morals, and is able to do this with a good conscience. Smith cant subscribe to the Slave Morality because, ostensibly, he does not know he is being subjugated. He cannot see his master as evil, because he is unaware that his mind has been manipulated by an outside somebody. Therefore, he bears no responsibility for his actions objet dart under the crop of the neural chip. Holbach Causal Determinism each(prenominal) Events are Caused Holbach states that because we are parts of the greater whole, which is nature, we cannot think, perceive or act without nature influencing us. In order to be free of nature, we would have to be free of physical sensitiveness which means coma, or death. ... Smith does not, even though it does no obvious harm. As a result, Smith, while under control of the chip, has no actual essence (Holbach) and is not truly alive. Under this system, a person is punished or rewarded due to his acting or not acting on his motives, which we all carry within us. Smiths volition to act or not act is compromised by the chip, so he should not be punished or rewarded for any actions. To be free is to yield to the requisite motives he carries within himself (Holbach, 113). Smiths processing of what his motives are, and what to do or not do near them, is controlled by the scientist. It is my position that the sc ientist alone experiences Holbachs limited freedom. Hume On Knowing and the Liberty of Spontaneity Hume defines the will as when we knowingly give rise to any young motion of our body, or a new perception of our mind (57). If Smiths thoughts are influenced by a neural chip, then Smiths actions, which are directed by this chip, are not mindful actions, but compulsions that have been generated by the chips impulses. Smith acts unknowingly, therefore he has no will. Humes main argument states that 2. All mental events (thoughts, feelings, etc.) and actions are constantly conjoined with some other (preceding) type of event, and the mind passes from a context of one to a consideration of the other (class notes, italics mine). Smiths mind is altered by the chip, and so altering the process of consideration from E to F. This makes for a false causal relation in call of the will. If causation depends on a determination of the mind, then Smiths mind is being indomitable by the scientist . There ends up being a